Why?

You know, I want to know why Ebert and Loder (of ALL people, who died at MTV and made that bag of bones a movie reviewer?) are completely down on Superman. It's starting to piss me off.

Kids, it's a comic/action flick. It is 99.999% not going to be an Oscar contender. We, the comic geekful, are not going to go and watch it expecting a performance on par with (insert Academy Award Winner here). There will be those comic purists who will be outraged by something non-canonical as well; big deal, it's a fucking MOVIE version.

Take it for what it is: a damn hot, strapping young man in blue tights who delivers his lines decently and with a decent plot and kick ass action sequences. Grab the popcorn!

I feel bad for Supes. A real nice dude (except for when you left Lois for five years, you jackass), saves the world a lot...and he's always alone.

Personally? I want another Superman movie in the works like now. And when is Lois going to wise up that Supes is Clark? Eh?

Now, a question/comment directed to Sullivan. I'd like to read more DC stuff, like Superman or Wonder Woman, but why do they make it so damn difficult by publishing 50 frikkin different Superman, Batman, etc., etc., etc., titles, all with different histories, retcons, whatever?! It's like why get invested? I'm trying to jump on board the new Wonder Woman volume but I've got my doubts. How long until they just pull some other "Infinite Crisis" and cancel/reboot again? It's too hard to keep this shit straight.